Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As I understand it, the engine is T53-17B. Performance wise I'm sure it will out do the 205A-1++ quite handily because being a 212 (albiet with one stove) it should retain it's 11200 internal / 11500 external load capabilities. I think Eagle could have just called it a 205B........ oh wait! that name's already taken.

The 212S will be a winner - much more attractive in my mind, than the Bell 210 (which I have seen up close and personal). Well done Eagle guys!

Posted
As I understand it, the engine is T53-17B. Performance wise I'm sure it will out do the 205A-1++ quite handily because being a 212 (albiet with one stove) it should retain it's 11200 internal / 11500 external load capabilities. I think Eagle could have just called it a 205B........ oh wait! that name's already taken.

The 212S will be a winner - much more attractive in my mind, than the Bell 210 (which I have seen up close and personal). Well done Eagle guys!

 

 

Maybe being picky but the 212 GW is 11200 lbs internal/external

 

The 212S will however be a real stump puller, I also heard it will retain the GW of the 212

Posted

Actually it's 10500 internal 11200 external, and our 205B does out perform the 205A1++.....but according to the pilots not by that much( does cruise faster though) and our B has a strake kit the A1 does not which could be the performance difference. just my 2 cents worth

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...