gwk Posted August 18, 2016 Report Share Posted August 18, 2016 Seems like fixing the problem would be better than asking for more waivers. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/helijet-transport-canada-safety-1.3725519 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winnie Posted August 19, 2016 Report Share Posted August 19, 2016 Same issue as in Halifax! What are the H1 issues?? why is it an issue now, and is the S-76 now dead as an Air Ambulance?? H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freewheel Posted August 19, 2016 Report Share Posted August 19, 2016 Recent inspections revealed non-compliance with requirements. How is it that previous inspections didn't reveal these non-compliances with requirements (which have been around for 9 years)? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diaper_Pin Posted August 22, 2016 Report Share Posted August 22, 2016 Bring on the 135's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just looking Posted August 22, 2016 Report Share Posted August 22, 2016 Its the age old problem. Everyone wants Cat A performance, but nobody wants to pay for it. For years the Oil companies have been saying 3 more years they won't use 212's. They are still using them. They also came up with the ridiculous rule no aircraft over 10 years old on long term contracts. I know for a fact 1 company signed a 5 year contract with an aircraft that was 9.5 years old at the time of award. It was approved as it was not 10 years old prior to the award. In fact i believe they are in negotiations to renew for 3 more years with the same machine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.