Doc B Posted July 21, 2011 Report Posted July 21, 2011 Thanks, Harmonic, for the considered and thoughtful reply to my post. Next time I need to formulate an opinion during my next ten years working on Bell mediums, I'll call you first. Since the point of the post was that the 412 has typically underperformed versus a 212, why would Wildcat go and buy a bunch? Since the owners of Wildcat seem to be pretty switched-on at finding niches to get their machines hired into, perhaps they have some knowledge of the capacities of the aircraft that might overcome the break-even-at-best useful load, and sub-par performance. Or maybe they're sending them international to some faraway place where nobody knows about 212s, or 205s (+, ++, or otherwise), or maybe even fire. Maybe we'll just have to see what they do next? DB: Edited to remove extra snark. 2 Quote
GreenArc Posted July 21, 2011 Report Posted July 21, 2011 Harmonic Vibe is 110% correct on the 205A-1++ except the internal gross weight is 10200 lbs. Ok, enlighten me. What part of the ++ upgrade ups the internal to 10200lbs? Quote
rainman Posted July 21, 2011 Report Posted July 21, 2011 What about getting cheap 412's and converting them to 212's??? Might that be the plan for at least some of them?? Quote
Hazy Posted July 21, 2011 Report Posted July 21, 2011 A lot of airframes differences between them to any converting. 412 (later models) have better driveshafting* thomas coupling type, more fuel load* ten tanks, horizontal stab not linked to the swashplate, major cowling differences* pain in the @ss. The head improvements have come a long ways. Been six years since I looked at one though. Quote
18speed Posted July 23, 2011 Report Posted July 23, 2011 Ok, enlighten me. What part of the ++ upgrade ups the internal to 10200lbs? Heli-Conversions Inc STC SH91-38 Installation of 212 main rotor blades on Bell 205A-1. Quote
mac Posted July 24, 2011 Report Posted July 24, 2011 Having flown the 412 on hot high altitude operations,if you get above 4000ft 24c it is overpriced junk.Dosent matter how much power you put thru the tranny those pathetic little blades dont produce in thinner air.Unless bell make parts really cheap and readily availible it will never succeed in the utility market.It is too maintainace intensive. Quote
MMike Posted July 25, 2011 Report Posted July 25, 2011 I could be wrong but isn't Cal-Fire moving towards the 412? Quote
stonefrigate Posted July 27, 2011 Report Posted July 27, 2011 Other than VIHs DOM planning a move to Wildcat, I think we will be just fine here at VIH. Thats the word on the street and at staging. Time will tell. Heard that VIH moved, in addition to the mediums this spring, a couple of ASTARS onto the N registry recently and the 135. Is this Northern Mountain all over again...????? Should I be concerned about my job? Heard Wildcat have bought 4 x 412's, ex presidential machines with one coming online very soon and the others next year.....maybe.....A good source that has seen these machines says they are in need of some good old TLC or at least some new paint! Is this the end of a era for 212's in Canada with the introduction of 412's for VFR fire work? :up: Quote
Doc B Posted July 27, 2011 Report Posted July 27, 2011 Having flown the 412 on hot high altitude operations,if you get above 4000ft 24c it is overpriced junk.Dosent matter how much power you put thru the tranny those pathetic little blades dont produce in thinner air. Hey, Mac, what model did you fly? Did it have the FastFin? Edit: Bad spelling (and on a one-line question yet). Quote
canuck600A Posted July 28, 2011 Report Posted July 28, 2011 Has the current Wildcat DOM moved on? Other than VIHs DOM planning a move to Wildcat, I think we will be just fine here at VIH. Thats the word on the street and at staging. Time will tell. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.