jetbox Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Good point CTD. Another arguement I heard for NOT increasing the rates was that if the rates increased to where they're supposed to be, a lot of customers would use other means to get the job done. (I believe this was also mentioned a few posts back) If that's the case, this would probably mean that the amount of yearly flying would go down. So is less flying for all operators necessarily a bad thing??? If we break it down into simple numbers, lets say this year every operator flies on average 600 hrs per ship at an average tarif of 1000$ per a/c. Would it be such a bad thing if the average went down to 400 hrs per a/c but at 20% higher tarrif? The machines fly less but make more money because there are less component changes, less 100hr inspections, etc. (these numbers don't necessarily add up, it's just an example!) I know all you guys getting paid flight pay are freaking out right now but if your flight pay also is increased so that your yearly salary remains the same even if you fly a bit less, are you not still happy?? Would we not have a chance to finally enjoy a little bit more of the summer if we're not going crazy chassing the work so much?? If the national fleet is flying less on average then we are also working not quite as hard for the same money. Would this not help alliviate the shortage of pilots and especially engineers?? Of course, this only works if we assume ALL the operators are getting a higher tarrif, flying less and still paying their crews the same. I know I know, I'm living in a dream world but heck, can't a guy have a dream??? :up: :up: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomex Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Attached link for USFS rates for light/intermediates. Interesting to see the HOGE requirement and the individual ships' performance at the specified HOGE alt/temp. USFS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Croucher Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 I have no problem publishing my rates - last year I got $160 per day, plus $60 p.h., plus $25 away from base and $35 food (may have been the other way round). Non-rev was paid for at the same rate. It was a steady year, in that I didn't necessarily work my tail off, yet I still managed to pull in $57K for just under 6 month's work. That would no doubt have been more if I'd managed to get to Kelowna. Why do I like fires? i feel as if I'm doing something useful, very few customers tell me how to do my job and I get minimums. And i meet all those guys I met the year before. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHEVY II Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Flight pay?? away from base?? 57K for half the year?? WTF?? And all you had to do was fly? :up: Just a minute...checking my math :shock: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Croucher Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hey Chevy - How's it hangin'? BTW there were a lot of guys getting more than that! Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumped Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-rex Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Here's my storey! On this past Thursday, an Alberta Gov't dept (Agriculture) phoned on the availability of an Astar. We had the aircraft that they were looking for.The person asked the common questions about rates,fuel,speed, and passengers, etc. We quoted the 2004 Alberta Gov't published rates. We contacted the fellow yesterday, as a follow up for the Monday AM flight. He stated another Calgary operator gave him "a much better deal" Is that egg in your face or what?? If there is anyone on here from that company shame on you!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
407 Driver Posted April 24, 2004 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Which Calgary operator would CUT the AB government published rates? Hmmmm, Only one comes to mind as a confirmed rate-cutter ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHEVY II Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Hey Phil...things are starting to wind up, extremely busy for me(kind of like that avatar you use with your name). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackmac Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 I'm probably getting into something I should stay out of, but having said that, I will go on to say the following. If the Alberta government is willing to pay xxx$ for a given requirement and ask you to provide it at the stated rate and go somewhere else at a lower rate, somebody is either getting paid of or really stupid. If such is the case you should have been given the opportunity to meet the other persons bid. Also telphone shot-gun bidding is illegal by most government departments, except of course the PMO. I would take this up at a higher level, including your area MP. IMHO Don PS: Years ago I advised the industry when I was working for the feds that Coast Guard would be taking over most of the Fisheries contracts, that were originally being flown by commercial operators. I advised HAC at the time that the government was not mandated or allowed to take work away from commercial operators. I advised them at the time to contact there respective MP's and raise a stink. How many Fisheries contracts do you see these days?????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.